9h00 - 18h00

Office Hours Mon. - Fri.

(+1) 212 922 0040

Call Us For Consultation

Facebook

Twitter

LinkedIn

Search
 

EMW&A News

CCJA: A Judgment Wrongly Considered As Of Last Resort Cannot Justify Referral To CCJA

The Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) stated in its Judgment No. 001/2017 of 26 January 2017 the principle that a judgment delivered by a court and wrongly considered as of last resort cannot justify referral to CCJA...

Continue reading

CCJA: A Provisional Remedy Not Reported Within Eight Days Should Be Declared Null And Void

Judgment No. 005/2017 of 26 January 2017 of the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) contains the principle that, it is unfounded the ground of an applicant in cassation which criticizes the judgment of the Court of appeal to have confirmed the lapse of the provisional remedy in that it has referred neither to copies of promissory notes on the basis of which the seizure was practiced nor denounced the said writ within eight days as required by Article 79 of the AUPSRVE...

Continue reading

CCJA Confirms the Presumption of Liability of Road Carrier

The Common Court of Justice and Arbitration, CCJA, of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa, held that provisions of Sections 16 and following of the Uniform Act related to contracts of carriage of goods by road impose on the carrier a presumption of liability which can only be exempted under the conditions laid down in Sections 17 and following of the same Uniform Act that he must invoke himself...

Continue reading

CCJA Sets aside application, as an unfamiliar procedure to the CCJA, thus inadmissible before the CCJA

In its judgment No. 029/2017 of 02 March 2017, the CCJA decided that an applicant’s request to set aside a judgment is inadmissible, this procedure being, pursuant to Section 32.2 of the Rules of Procedure, unfamiliar before the CCJA...

Continue reading

CCJA: Is considered purely factual, the allegation of a party which said to have been ordered to pay the DI which is not one

The Judgment No. 005/2017 of 26 January 2017 of the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) contains the principle that must be dismissed the ground of an applicant in cassation which criticizes the judgment of the Court of Appeal to have disregarded the meaning of Section 49 of the AUPRVE in that it sentenced him to damages while the said Court of Appeal did not pronounce condemnation for damages against him, such a ground is unsubstantiated and therefore purely factual...

Continue reading

CCJA Reaffirms Its Supremacy Over Courts of Cassation of Member States

Is null and void, a judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of a Member State of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa, (“OHADA”), when the incompetence of the latter had previously been raised that the dispute fell within the application of a Uniform Act...

Continue reading

CCJA: There Is No Conflict When Two Separate Decisions Of The Same Court Contradict Themselves

In its Judgment No. 065/2017 of 30 March 2017, the CCJA has decided that the appeal in cassation based on the inconsistency of grounds noted in two different judgments delivered on two different dates and between the same parties in relation to the same matter, must be dismissed on the ground that the implementation of Section 28 bis of the new Rules of procedure of the CCJA assumes that in the same decision a court has clearly contradicted itself by stating conflicting grounds...

Continue reading

CCJA: Provisionary Seizure Are Real Enforcement Proceedings

The Judgment No. 005/2017 of 26 January 2017 of the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) contains the principle whereby is unfounded the ground of appeal which criticizes the judgment of the Court of Appeal to have violated Section 28 of the AUPRVE in that the applicant alleges that the provisional seizure are not real enforcement proceedings while the provision referred to lists them among enforcement proceedings...

Continue reading

CCJA Cannot Evoke If The Decision It Cancels Is Not Served On The Parties Before The National Court

From the moment that the cancellation decision has not been served on all the parties before the national court for the purposes of cassation appeal to the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration, “CCJA,” there is no reason for evocation in accordance with Section 52 of the Rules of Procedures...

Continue reading

CCJA: The Bailiff Does Not Have Exclusive Powers To Seize The Competent Court In Case Of Difficulty In The Compulsory Execution Of A Title

For the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration, “CCJA”, of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa, “OHADA”, when there are difficulties in the execution of an enforceable title, the initiative to seize the competent court conferred on the bailiff does not prohibit people with interest and quality to act in their own names for the defense of their interests...

Continue reading

CCJA Dismissed the Appeal of Côte d’Ivoire Télécom Company for Foreclosure

In its Judgment No. 124/2017 of 18 May 2017, in the case that opposed Côte d’Ivoire Télécom company to Intel Afrique company, the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) has confirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeal dismissing the injunction request to pay introduced eight (8) years after issuing the enforcement orders...

Continue reading

CCJA: Appeal for Annulment of An Arbitral Award is Admissible Upon Ruling

In its judgment No. 034/2017 of March 9, 2017, the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) of the Organization for the Harmonization in Africa of Business Law (OHADA) has confirmed the provisions of Section 27 of the Uniform Act relating to the Law of Arbitration which provides that an action for annulment of an arbitration award is to be declared acceptable if it is brought as soon as the said award is made. It cannot be received if it has not been exercised upon it being served or within the month of it is served with an executor...

Continue reading

Impact of the amendment of the Legal Guarantee of Stability in respect of Existing Mining Projects in the DRC

The Government of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) commenced the review process in respect of its Act No. 007/2002 of 11 July 2002 on Mining Code (Mining Code) in 2012. The process eventually culminated in the promulgation by the President of the Republic of the act amending the Mining Code (“Amending Act”)[2]. As promulgated, the Amending Act contains provisions which considerably affect the fiscal, customs and exchange regimes of the Mining Code and a number of critical provisions for the protection of existing mining Projects, in particular, Article 276 related to the Guarantee of Stability (“Legal Guarantee of Stability”)[3]. In this analysis, we will first...

Continue reading

CCJA Quashes the Judgment of a Court of Appeal that Failed to Review the Cross-Appeal

Judgment No 126/2017 of 18 May 2017, delivered by the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA) of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA), stated the principle that  judgment of the Court of Appeal which ruled only on the application of the appellant and failed to review the head of claim of the appellant on the increase of the penalty payment must be quashed...

Continue reading

CCJA: The sale of a building that occurred during the statements and observations proceedings should be canceled

The Common Court of Justice and Arbitration, “CCJA” of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA) held that it does not infringe Section 313 of the Uniform Act Organizing Simplified Recovery Procedures and Measures of Execution, the judgment holding that the 15-day period provided for by law to seek the nullity of the award can no longer be required in cases of illegal or fraudulent sale or when  the statements and observations proceedings are still pending in court… Read More...

Continue reading

CCJA: Inadmissibility of an Application Effected without Mandate by a Lawyer Being the Chosen Domicilium Citandi et Executandi 

Judgment  No 110/2017 delivered on 11 May 2017 by the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration, CCJA, of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa, states  the principle of inadmissibility of an appeal for arbitral award review  undertaken by the appellant  whereas the appeal was solely  signed by the Lawyer being the chosen  domicilium citandi et executandi for the purpose of the arbitral proceedings and not by lawyers holding special mandate of representation… Read More...

Continue reading

OHADA Bar Association: Shaky Victory of African Lawyers and Bar Associations

The initiative of setting up an association of lawyers performing at the Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA), OHADA Bar Association, was brought specially by the Paris Bar in the early June 2015. It was criticized by French speaking African lawyers and Bar Associations from member States of the Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa (OHADA)… Read More...

Continue reading

OHADA: Various Remedies Against an Arbitral Award

The African legislator uses the word “arbitration” without defining it. Commonly, it is considered as private method of the dispute settlement based on the Agreement of the Parties.Thus, arbitration is considered by some authors as conventional justice. Arbitration is a dispute settlement procedure by a private person, called an arbitrator, who is vested with the power to judge by the Parties. It is predominantly used for the settlement of disputes arising from complex international contracts… Read More...

Continue reading